Gifts of BPR-qualifying assets - is there a tax cost?
As your estate will be hit by the cap on inheritance tax (IHT) business property relief (BPR), you’re giving away some of your qualifying investments to your children. What should you tell them to ensure they’ll continue to benefit from BPR?
Capped BPR
The aftershock from the 2024 Budget announcement that inheritance tax (IHT) agricultural property relief (APR) and business property relief (BPR) will be capped is still being felt. While farmers are the main group making noises about the impact, small business owners are also affected, as are individuals who have BPR-qualifying investments, such as shares in AIM-listed companies. One way to preserve the maximum BPR is to give away some of these investments, say to your children. The trouble is there’s a possible catch.
IHT and gifts
Before looking at the particular issue with BPR- qualifying investments we need to recap the general IHT rules for gifts. If you make a gift to an individual and survive seven years, it becomes exempt from IHT. Thus, at the time of the gift it’s referred to as a “potentially exempt transfer” (PET). If you don’t survive seven years it’s known as a failed PET and its value is included in your estate when IHT is calculated.
BPR and lifetime gifts
If you give away an asset that qualifies for BPR, such as AIM shares, there are further rules if the PET fails. If the person receiving the gift wants to retain BPR:
- they must have owned the assets from the date of the gift until your death (or their own, if that’s earlier); and
- for unquoted shares, such as those listed on the AIM, they must remain unquoted.
If the person you gifted the assets to, say your son, sells them before your death, the first condition is not met and so BPR is immediately lost.
Example. You give shares worth £300,000 to your son who sells half of them soon after and invests the proceeds in a non-BPR qualifying asset, e.g. a savings account. Six years later you die and so the gift of AIM shares is a failed PET. Although all the shares you gave away qualified for BPR at the time, because your son sold half of them the BPR on that part is lost. Any IHT payable as a result of this will normally be payable by your son.
Replacement property solution
If the assets have been sold, there is a possible remedy. Using our example, if your son uses any of the proceeds to purchase BPR-qualifying replacement assets, the IHT relief is not lost on the amount reinvested. Your son would have up to three years from the date he sold the AIM shares you gave him in which to make a qualifying reinvestment.
When making a gift that can easily be converted to cash, such as AIM shares, make the conditions of BPR clear to the recipient. Point out that if BPR is lost any IHT becomes payable as a result and it’s they who will be liable to pay it. Explain that they can sell and reinvest the money without losing BPR if the new investment also meets the conditions for BPR, e.g. investing in their own trading business.
Related Topics
-
Payment deadline for corporation tax
-
HMRC targets undeclared consultancy income in the medical sector
HMRC is writing to people working in the medical sector where information supplied by private healthcare providers suggests that consultancy fees may have been omitted from their tax returns. Recipients have 30 days to check their position and respond. What should you do if you get a letter?
-
MONTHLY FOCUS: BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY RELIEF: WHAT DO THE NEW IHT RULES MEAN FOR YOU?
The inheritance tax treatment of businesses and farms changed fundamentally from 6 April 2026. The amount that can qualify for 100% business property relief and agricultural property relief is now capped, potentially leaving families with a significant tax bill for the first time. What has changed, and what should business owners and farmers be doing about it?